...
The initial workflow for the Data Grooming users consists of the evaluation, i.e. the approval and discarding of Authoring Memory Candidates.
Authors submit sentences, thereby requesting these to be added to the Authoring Memory. Data Grooming users determine whether to add the sentences. Inappropriate sentences are discarded. In the Congree Authoring Client, the authors receive substantiated feedback when they compose a discarded sentence. In this way, the Data Grooming users interact with the authors.
...
This is where the reevaluation workflow comes in. Approved sentences may be discarded by Data Grooming users for specific reasons. Discarded sentences may be approved. Reevaluations are possible without any limitations and are documented in an evaluation history.
...
To evaluate unwanted sentences, Data Grooming users can challenge the Authoring Memory proposals for the candidates in the Data Grooming Manager. After challenging them, they can evaluate the Authoring Memory proposals in the Challenged menu.
...